http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=c9d113eb-62ab-44b4-a1f5-49661b1d0031%40sessionmgr15&vid=1&hid=23&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=anh&AN=SYD-606F8C0AMW8OSNV4O1R A second lease on life? The scientific content is accurate but not very thorough or indepth, the topic is given little evidence but rather focuses on creating a message. The language is quite easy and simple to understand and since the evidence is quite broad and the there is no reason to distrust the author. He also seems quite unbiased, giving evidence for both sides of the issue.
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=84020788-5cfa-47aa-82e2-c0b206d000d2%40sessionmgr4&vid=1&hid=23&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=anh&AN=7EH2390479150 A risky kiss of life. Here Abul Taher writes that the Japanese have created a new way to clone extinct animals and have succesfully cloned healthy mice that had died 16 years before. He also mentioned that in the US, scientists were able to clone dozens of embryos from a rhesus macaque and then finally writes that the experiments being conducted could lead the resurrection of humans in cryo-preservation clinics. The author is from a prominent Australian newsletter and his work seems farily accurate but as before the detail provided is not very indepth and is quite superficial. His work is well structured and is easy to understand and also is deemed credible. Both sides are covered fairly.
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=4f771b5c-d0a1-4ac0-82ef-43cbd58e9427%40sessionmgr15&vid=1&hid=23&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=anh&AN=86710979 High-tech advances offer hope for return of extinct animals. David Perlman writes from San Fransisco Chronicle about the advances in cloning technology. He gives clear and concise evidence but again because the evidence is so broad it can only be said as accurate. The information given is similar to the other two to say that it is not indepth and is quite broad. The wording is quite complex and is moderate in its' understanding. The author is quite unbiased and does not seem to favour a side.
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=395a97e5-b7d3-468e-95c2-0bd88b688c81%40sessionmgr13&vid=1&hid=23&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=anh&AN=37572160 Recipe for Resurrection Tom Mueller writes from National Geographic about cloning. The scientific content is quite precise and accurate. It goes in to quite some depth, including the process of cloning as well as giving many examples. The language though complex is quite sensible and straighforward. National Geographic is an extremely wellknown and prominent organisation which is very thorough in its credibility. The author seems to focus on the negatives rather than the positives.
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=ad9817b1-2bd8-436b-87a2-eae5d62e11a9%40sessionmgr11&vid=1&hid=23&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=anh&AN=86888741 The Walking Dead Bryan Walsh from TIME magazine writes about the effects of reviving extinct animals. The article seems detailed and genuine. The information is short but quite indepth. THe language is quite emotive and strong and gives a clear message. Like the National Geographic, TIME is a wellknown magazine which thoroughly checks its own credibility. The author also focuses on the negative effects on society.